9-19-2007
STAFFORD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES September 19, 2007
The
regular meeting of the Stafford County Planning Commission of Wednesday,
September 19, 2007, was called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Chairman William Cook in
the Board of Supervisors Chambers of the Stafford County Administration Center
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Cook, Kirby, Pitzel, Mitchell, Carlone, Rhodes, and Di Peppe
MEMBERS ABSENT:
None
STAFF PRESENT:
Harvey, Judy, Baker, Stepowany, Hornung, Schulte, Hamock, and
Gregori
DECLARATIONS OF
DISQUALIFICATIONS:
None
PUBLIC PRESENTATIONS:
Patricia Kurpiel, Friends of Stafford Creek, stated
she would like to re-look at public institutions in T-2 zone within the
Traditional Neighborhood Design (TND). She stated, in her opinion, the
libraries, schools, and recreation facilities belong closer to populated areas.
She stated the definition of allocated density was: gross track plus gross
acreage. She stated the Planned Urban Development model used allocated density.
She stated we did not have a Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) in process,
and the developer would not consider transferring density. She stated the Board
of Supervisors uses Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) and Purchase of
Development Rights (PDR) to save rural areas. She stated the Planning Commission
should consider the TND Ordinance apply only to infill and contiguous
development. She stated if we do not have 4 to 5 units
per acre, we will not get bus service. She stated the Planning Department should
use the TND the smartest way we can.
Nan
Rollison stated we need to find a balance for prosperous and healthy environment
and TND was giving developers all the cookies without the TDR program. She
stated Albemarle
and Blacksburg Counties are passing the TDR.
PUBLIC
HEARINGS:
1.
Comprehensive
Plan Compliance Review – Channel Cove - A request for review to determine
compliance with the Comprehensive Plan in accordance with Section 15.2-2232 of
the Code of Virginia (1950) as amended, for T-Mobile Communication to co-locate
telecommunication antennas onto an existing Dominion Virginia Power Transmission
Tower on Assessor's Parcel 21B-519, located on Channel Cove, approximately 200
feet east of Aquia Drive in the Aquia Election District. (CANCELLED)
2.
Comprehensive Plan Compliance Review – Harpoon Drive - A
request for review to determine compliance with the Comprehensive Plan in
accordance with Section 15.2-2232 of the Code of Virginia (1950) as amended, for
T-Mobile Communication to co-locate telecommunication antennas onto an existing
Dominion Virginia Power Transmission Tower on Assessor's Parcel 21B-1492,
located on Harpoon Drive, approximately 200 feet east of Victoria Drive in the
Aquia Election District.
Jamie Stepowany presented the
staff report. He stated the applicant would like to collocate nine
telecommunication antenna panels onto an existing VEPCO transmission tower. He
stated the height of the existing tower was 105 feet and the height of the
antenna panels would be 100 feet.
He stated the compound area within the base of the transmission tower
would be fenced. He stated there was direct access from Harpoon Drive. He
stated staff recommends collocation onto existing transmission tower and
recommends having telecommunication facilities at a distance from residences. He
stated the tower was located near the center of a 33 acre open space, owned by
Aquia Harbour Home Owners Association and provides wireless service to
Aquia
Harbour and Widewater
areas.
Mrs. Carlone asked if there were
any water tower in the area.
Mr. Stepowany stated no, the
water towers were 100 feet away.
Mr. Pitzel asked if there would
be an enclosure at the base of the tower.
Mr. Stepowany stated yes with a
privacy fence.
Mrs. Carlone asked what materials
would be used.
Mr. Stepowany stated board on
board wooden fence.
Mrs. Kirby asked the location of
Channel Cove tower.
Mr. Stepowany stated that tower
was on the same line just north of Government Island.
Mrs. Kirby asked if it was about
one mile.
Mr. Cook stated it was
approximately one and one half mile.
Mr. Mitchell asked if there was a
bond put on this for maintenance.
Mr. Stepowany stated there were
no requirements for co-location. He stated there was more coverage needed for
larger capacity and the map shows a larger coverage area. He stated to get more
coverage would require going higher on existing structures such as transmission
lines or water towers.
Matt Chaney representing T-Mobile
stated he would answer questions.
Mrs. Carlone asked if the fence
could be white plastic fencing for aesthetics.
Mr. Chaney stated T-Mobile can do
white plastic fencing.
Mr. Pitzel asked if only T-Mobile
customers would benefit from this coverage.
Mr. Chaney stated yes.
Mr. Pitzel asked if there was
coverage by Virginia Railway Express (VRE).
Mr. Chaney stated no due to the
height.
Mrs. Kirby asked if there was
already coverage provided to Aquia Harbour and Widewater.
Mr. Stepowany stated he did not
know if Nextel had coverage in Aquia Harbour, but this coverage was only for
T-Mobile.
Ms. Kirby asked if each company
would need its own pole for coverage.
Mr. Stepowany recommended
co-location on transmission tower.
Mrs. Kirby asked about the tax
ramifications that benefit Stafford County.
Mr. Harvey stated we would have
to check with Commissioner of Revenue.
Mr. Chaney stated the questions
that had been removed did not apply to the application.
Mr. Mitchell asked what T-Mobile
was looking for in the white area of the map.
Mr. Chaney stated he was not sure
of what was over there and did not have information so he could not answer the
question. He stated T-Mobile wanted to give credence to customer complaints,
such as dropped calls in that area.
Mr. Mitchell asked if T-Mobile
had made arrangements or paid any money to the Homeowners Association (HOA).
Mr. Chaney stated yes.
Mr. Cook stated the white area on
the map was Widewater.
Mr. Cook opened the public
hearing.
Nan Rollison stated the fish and
wildlife recommend co-location and stated the Planning Commission should look at
long range plans of the number of towers that are going there in the future. She
stated that poles could be used as habitat homes. She stated this was a very
nice piece of land and would be glad to offer a CD on managing Utilities Right
of Way to T-Mobile.
With no one else coming forward
Mr. Cook closed public hearing.
Mr. Mitchell made a motion for
approval. Mrs. Carlone seconded. The motion passed 7-0.
3.
CUP2700542; Conditional Use Permit - Vulcan Westlake - A request
for a conditional use permit to allow a street within a Flood Hazard (FH)
Overlay District, specifically to provide access across Horse Pen Run to the
proposed Vulcan Quarry on part of Assessor's Parcels 35-21, 23 and 24 consisting
of 8.2 acres, located on the south side of Warrenton Road, west of Holly Corner
Road and along Cedar Grove Road within the Hartwood Election District. (Time Limit: December 17,
2007)
Kathy
Baker presented the staff report. She stated there was a
proposed quarry site in 1989. She stated the access road to the quarry would
cross Horsepen Run, there would be a 70-foot wide easement with, 30-foot road
width, and 10,800 foot road length. She stated the crossing would include box
culverts. She stated the access road was regulated by the Virginia Department of
Mines and Minerals. She stated the Floodplain Study indicates potential net
increase in base flood elevations to exceed 1 foot, with a maximum increase of
2.4 feet. She stated no dwellings or structures are located within the proposed
increase in base flood elevation and increased elevation would not impact any
adjacent properties. She stated the proposed conditions include: Location of
street crossing shall be in general location as shown on GDP, applicants to
obtain all state, federal, and local permits for stream encroachment, water
quality, wetlands, land disturbance, and Chesapeake Bay overlay requirements,
applicants shall obtain Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR), construction
of road crossing limited to 6am to 8pm, applicant shall submit MWQIA, and
applicant shall notify Code Administration prior to construction. She stated
staff believes the request, with the proposed conditions, meets the standards
for issuance of the permit. She stated there are no impacts to adjacent parcels
and staff recommends approval of the application with conditions specified in
R07- 399.
Mrs. Carlone
asked what the normal procedure was after we approve the CUP. She stated when
the Planning Commission approved Westlake there were no conditions put on the
road. She asked why the CLOMR was not provided
Mrs. Baker stated that
application was a special exception and is now it is a Conditional Use Permit.
She stated that if this application was approved then the applicant would
provide the CLOMR.
Mrs. Carlone stated, in her
opinion, this was not a temporary road.
Mrs. Baker
stated the road would last as long the quarry was operating.
Mrs. Kirby
stated, in her opinion, it was not a temporary road.
Mr. Harvey
stated the road was permitted by the Army Corps of Engineers, as long as the
mine site
was
operating.
Mrs. Kirby stated that Vulcan on
Garrisonville
Road operated for 25 years and it was not a temporary
site.
Mrs. Baker
stated the site would be reclaimed, and as stated by the Army Corps of Engineers
this
would qualify
as a temporary road.
Mrs. Kirby
stated it was not fair to the citizens of Stafford County.
Mrs. Baker
stated the issue being discussed was the flood plains and elevation.
Mrs. Kirby
stated the CLOMR map showed the impacts.
Mr. Di Peppe
asked if the culverts would be removed once the temporary road was no longer in
use.
Clark Leming, Leming & Healy,
stated Cedar Grove
Lane would be the primary access to the quarry. He
stated Cedar Grove
Lane would be improved and the portion of the road
the Planning Commission was concerned with was private and strictly for use by
Vulcan. He stated a CUP was required to increase the base flood elevation at
Horse Pen Run. He stated the Box Culverts would cause a rise in the base flood
level. He stated the floodway range was between 1 and 8 feet. He stated the FEMA
Zone A had a 1% chance of flooding at this location and the crossing was
designed to have the least impact in regards to the road. He stated there would
be no special treatment because the road was temporary. He stated if the road
was retired, the culverts would be removed and the road would be closed. He
stated one major users of the quarry site would be Rocky Pen Reservoir. He
stated FEMA would not accept the CLOMR until the Planning Commission approved
the CUP.
Mrs. Kirby stated, in her
opinion, the reclamation time was not within the scope of time to be considered
temporary.
Walter Beckwin stated at the time
the mine was exhausted the box culverts would be removed, the water levels would
be adjusted, bringing back the original contours, the base would be removed from the road,
reseeded if needed, and new trees would be planted.
Mrs. Kirby
stated that coming in on Richard
Ferry Road would have negated this.
Mr. Leming
stated that was not in compliance with the proffers.
Mr. Cook
opened the public hearing.
With no one
coming forward the public hearing was closed.
Mrs. Carlone
asked what the hours of operations would be.
Mr. Leming stated the hours of
operation were from 6:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., but that only applies to road
construction.
Mrs. Carlone
made a motion for approval. Mr. Rhodes seconded. The motion passed 7-0.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
4.
Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan – Centreport Gateway – A
proposed amendment to the Land Use Plan map component of the Comprehensive Plan.
The proposed amendment would redesignate Assessor’s Parcel 37-25
from Light Industrial, Suburban Residential, and Resource Protection land use to
Urban Commercial and Resource Protection land use consisting of 51.25 acres,
located on the west side of Interstate 95 separated in two parts by Centerport
Parkway within the Hartwood Election District. The Urban Commercial designation
would allow development of commercial retail and office uses. (Time Limit:
October 16, 2007)(Deferred to the October 3, 2007 Work Session at applicants
request)
Mr.
Cook stated Item 4 was deferred to the October 3, 2007 Work Session.
5.
RC2700199; Reclassification – Centreport Gateway - A proposed
reclassification from A-1, Agricultural to B-2, Urban Commercial Zoning District
to allow for the development of a commercial office park to include a mix of
offices, retail commercial uses, and a hotel on Assessor's Parcel 37-25
consisting of 51.25 acres, located on the west side of Interstate 95 separated
in two parts by Centreport Parkway within the Hartwood Election District. The
Comprehensive Plan recommends the property for Light Industrial, Suburban
Residential, and Resource Protection uses. The Light Industrial designation
would allow light industrial, light manufacturing and office uses. The Suburban
Residential use would permit single family residential development at a density
of three (3)
dwelling units per acre. See Section 28-35 of the Zoning Ordinance for a
full listing of permitted uses in the B-2 Zoning District. (Time Limit:
October 16, 2007) (Deferred to the October 3, 2007 Work Session at applicants
request)
Mr.
Cook stated Item 5 was deferred to the October 3, 2007 Work Session.
6.
Comprehensive Plan Amendment - Stafford Town Station – A proposed amendment to the
Land Use Plan map component of the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed amendment
would redesignate Assessor’s Parcel’s 38-29, 38-29A, 38-121, 38-121A, 38-122,
38-122A and 38-124 from Light Industrial, Rural Residential, and Resource
Protection to Urban Commercial, Urban Residential, and Resource Protection Land
Use and extend the Urban Services Area to comprise the above referenced parcels.
The proposed amendment would be for the purpose of developing a P-TND, Planned
Traditional Neighborhood Development. (Time Limit: November 13, 2007) (Deferred
to October 11, 2007 Work Session)
Mr.
Cook stated Item 6 was deferred to the October 11, 2007 Work Session.
7.
RC2700296; Reclassification - Stafford Town Station - A proposed
reclassification from A-1, Agricultural Zoning District and B-1, Convenience
Commercial Zoning District to P-TND, Planned Traditional Neighborhood
Development Zoning District on Assessor's Parcels 38-29, 38-29A, 38-121,
38-121A, 38-122, 38-122A and 38-124 consisting of 562.58 acres, located on the
east side of Jefferson Davis Highway approximately 300 feet south of American
Legion Road and along Eskimo Hill Road within the Aquia Election District. The
Comprehensive Plan recommends the property for Light Industrial use which would
allow a variety of industrial manufacturing and office uses. The Rural
Residential designation would allow development of three (3) acre lots for
single family residential use. The Resource Protection designation would require
stream protection buffers along all streams that exhibit perennial flow
characteristics. See Section 28-35 of the Zoning Ordinance for a complete
listing of permitted uses in the P-TND Zoning District. (Time Limit: November 13, 2007) (Deferred
to October 11, 2007 Work Session)
Mr.
Cook stated Item 7 was deferred to the October 11, 2007 Work Session.
8.
SUB2600625; Williams Subdivision, Preliminary Subdivision Plan - A
preliminary subdivision plan for 13 single family
residential lots, zoned A-2, Rural Residential, consisting of 14.55 acres
located on the north side of Enon Road approximately 1,500 feet west of Wyatt
Lane on Assessor's Parcels 45-125 and 45-125B within the Hartwood Election
District. (Time Limit: February 28,
2007)(Deferred to January 1, 2008 Regular Meeting at the applicants
request)
Mr.
Cook stated Item 8 was deferred to the January 9, 2008 Regular Meeting.
9.
SUB2600178; Aquia Overlook,
Section 3 Revised, Preliminary Subdivision Plan - A revised preliminary subdivision plan for Section 3
with 36 single family residential lots, zoned A-1, Agricultural and A-2, Rural
Residential, consisting of 102 acres located on the north side of Decatur Road
across from Indian View Court on Assessor's Parcels 31-13D, 15A and 16 within
the Griffis-Widewater Election District. (Time Limit: November 27, 2007) (Deferred
to September 19, 2007 Work Session)
Mr.
Cook stated Item 9 was deferred to the October 17, 2007 Work Session.
NEW BUSINESS:
None
MINUTES
None
PLANNING DIRECTOR’S REPORT
Mr. Harvey asked if we should
advertise and televise the October 11, 2007 Work Session.
Mr. Cook stated yes.
Mr. Harvey stated at the Board of
Supervisors meeting on September 18, 2007 there was discussion of the
Comprehensive Plan review concerning the state requirements for build out in the
Urban Service Area, consider 10 acre density with Purchase of Development Rights
and Transfer of Development Rights. He stated the Planning Commission would hold
a meeting on October 8, 2007 to discuss Comprehensive Plan revision. He stated
the Planning Commission should look at the winter schedule.
The Planning Commission voted to
amend there winter schedule.
Mr. Cook moved the second meeting
in November to November 28, 2007 and stated the January meeting would be changed
to January 9, 2008 and January 23, 2008.
COUNTY
ATTORNEY’S REPORT
Mr. Judy stated today was National Talk Like a Pirate Day,
other than that no report.
SECRETARY/TREASURER REPORT
No report
STANDING COMMITTEE REPORTS
Mr. Pitzel stated there would be a special presentation of
the Urban Development Area at the October 8, 2007 Planning Commission Meeting to
discuss the Comprehensive Plan Review.
CONSENT AGENDA
None
SPECIAL COMMITTEE REPORTS
Mrs. Carlone asked about the reservoir.
Mrs. Baker stated the Reservoir Protection Overlay District
was still in committee with the Board of Supervisors.
Mr. Di Peppe asked if the Planning Commission could
continue discussion of the TND Ordinance modifications.
Mr. Cook stated yes.
Ordinance Committee Continued
Mr. Stepowany recommended the Planning Commission continue
Ordinance Committee discussion on P-TND.
Mrs. Carlone stated Mr. Stepowany should address the points
that Patricia Kurpiel brought up.
Mr. Di Peppe stated they were already addressed at Work
Session.
Mrs. Carlone stated the density in T-2 should be
eliminated.
Mr. Stepowany stated staff disagrees. He stated there
should be larger facilities in open zones.
Mr. Di Peppe stated the TND only requires three transect
zones.
Mr. Stepowany stated T-2 can be in the middle of T-3 and
maximum lot coverage requires each transect zone to have maximum lot
coverage.
Mr. Di Peppe asked if there was anyway to overcome that.
Mr. Stepowany stated from what he has seen T-2 was used for
more public area. He stated each transect zone has a maximum lot coverage zone.
He stated T-5 and T-6 were greater then T-3 and T-4 and T-2 was not used if
there are public facilities in T-2.
Mr. Stepowany stated there was Muse, green area between
groups of houses which was open area with the garage behind the house.
Mr. Cook stated under section 28-35, table 3.1, the
following uses permitted be right should be stricken: dormitory schools, funeral
homes, golf courses, green houses, stables, vehicle fuel sales/auto repair.
Mr. Pitzel asked what was wrong with fuel sales. He stated
one place close to home to buy gas was good.
Mr. Cook stated fuel sales could be permitted with a
CUP.
Mrs. Kirby asked what high intensity retail would be.
Mr. Stepowany stated such as gift shops or convenient
stores.
Mr. Cook stated definitely remove stables, funeral homes,
and golf courses.
Mr. Pitzel stated the whole point of the TND was to be
compact and a golf course was not compact.
Mr. Cook stated that a college with no dormitory would be
acceptable.
Mr. Di Peppe stated a college would bring people in from
outside the community.
Mr. Cook stated that vocational schools have no business in
TND.
Mr. Stepowany stated Strayer College was a good example of a
professional school.
Mrs. Carlone stated colleges and vocational schools bring
people in.
Mr. Pitzel stated schools should be left in TND.
Mr. Di Peppe stated funeral homes, stables, golf courses,
and green houses are to be taken out of the TND.
Mr. Rhoades stated he agrees.
Mr. Harvey stated to bring TND back to 10/3/2007 Work
Session.
Mr. Cook stated TND can go to Public Hearing November 7,
2007.
Mr. Di Peppe mad a motion to approve O07-71 for Public
Hearing. Mr. Mitchell seconded. The motion passed 7-0.
CHAIRMAN’S REPORT
No Report
ADJOURNMENT
With no further business to discuss Mrs. Kirby made a motion
to adjourn. Mr. Mitchell seconded. The meeting was adjourned at 9:19 p.m.
|