 About Stafford |
|||
| Employment |
|||
 Boards and Commissions |
|||
 |
|
Board of Supervisors | |
|
|
|
Agendas |
|
|
|
Minutes |
|
|
|
Audio |
|
|
|
Indexes |
| Departments |
|||
| Public Schools |
|||
| Residents |
|||
| Business |
|||
| Visiting |
|||
| Contact Information |
|||
|
February 20, 2007
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY OF STAFFORD STAFFORD, VIRGINIA MINUTES
Regular Meeting Call to Order. A regular meeting of the Stafford County Board of Supervisors was called to order by Jack R. Cavalier, Chairman, at 1:00 P. M., Tuesday, February 20, 2007, in the Board Chambers, Stafford County Administration Center.
Roll Call. The following members were present: Peter J. Fields; Robert C. Gibbons; Paul V. Milde III; George H. Schwartz; M. S. “Joe” Brito; Jack R. Cavalier, Chairman; Also in attendance were: Steve Crosby, County Administrator; Joe Howard, County Attorney and Marty Beard, Chief Deputy Clerk.
Legislative; Presentation of a Proclamation. Legislative; Work Session with Airport Authority. Mr. Michael Wood, Vice Chairman of the Stafford Regional Airport Authority, introduced member Henry Scharpenberg, who gave a presentation and responded to Board members questions. Discussion ensued.
Mr. Schwartz motioned, seconded by Mr. Gibbons, to adopt proposed Resolution Discussion further ensued.
The Voting Board tally was: Resolution R07-86 reads as follows:
A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE EXECUTION AND
WHEREAS, the Stafford Regional Airport Authority (the "Authority") presently owns, operates and maintains a regional airport serving the needs of the residents of Stafford County, Virginia (the "County"); and 1. Approval of Support Agreement. The Support Agreement is approved in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit A, with such changes, insertions, or omissions as may be approved by the Chairman of the Board, whose approval shall be evidenced conclusively by the execution and delivery of the Support Agreement on the County's behalf. The Chairman of the Board is authorized to execute and deliver the Support Agreement and such other documents and certificates as such officer may consider necessary in connection therewith. 2. Approval of Security Agreement. The Security Agreement is approved in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit B, with such changes, insertions, or omissions as may be approved by the Chairman of the Board, whose approval shall be evidenced conclusively by the execution and delivery of the Security Agreement on the County's behalf. The Chairman of the Board is authorized to execute and deliver the Security Agreement and such other documents and certificates as such officer may consider necessary in connection therewith. 3. Operating Expense Support Statement. The Board further declares it does not intend to increase its operating expense support contribution to the Authority beyond its existing agreed-upon levels. Any further future operating expense overruns of the Authority need to be absorbed or adjusted by the Authority. 4. No Pledge. Nothing contained herein or in the Support Agreement or the Security Agreement is or shall be deemed to be a lending of the credit of the County to the Authority, VRA, or to any holder of the Local Bond or to any other person, and nothing herein contained is or shall be deemed to be a pledge of the faith and credit or the taxing power of the County, nor shall anything contained herein or in the Support Agreement or the Security Agreement legally bind or obligate the Board to appropriate funds for the purposes described in the Support Agreement. 5. Sequence of County Contributions Used for Debt Service. If the County’s moral obligation is invoked, the County’s proportionate share of debt service paid on the financing for the Project shall be taken from the first dollars the County annually sends to the Authority. 6. Airport Authority Property Lien. The Board insists on a commitment from the Authority that if the County’s moral obligation on this financing is invoked and results in supplemental payments by the Board for debt service on the Local Bond, then a lien by the Board on the property of the Authority will be created in an amount equal to the Board’s supplemental debt service payments or contributions. 7. Further Actions; Authorized Representations. All officers and agents of the Board and the County are authorized and directed to take such further actions in conformity with the purpose and intent of this Resolution as may be necessary or appropriate in connection with the issuance and sale by the Authority of the Bond, and the execution, delivery and performance of the Support Agreement and the Security Agreement, including the execution and delivery on behalf of the County of such instruments, documents, or certificates as necessary or appropriate to carry out the transactions contemplated by this Resolution. All actions previously taken by such officers and agents in connection with the issuance and sale of the Bond are ratified and confirmed. 8. Repeal of Conflicting Resolutions. All resolutions are repealed to the extent they are inconsistent with this Resolution. 9. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect immediately. Mr. Gibbons motioned, seconded by Mr. Schwartz, to sign the fourth amendment to the Agreement..
The Voting Board tally was: Legislative; Work Session on Erosion and Sediment Control Program and Stormwater Management. Mr. Steve Hubble, Environmental Programs Coordinator, gave a presentation and responded to Board members questions. Recess. At 3:15 P.M., the Chairman declared a recess. Call to Order. At 3:25 P.M., the Chairman called the meeting back to order. Legislative; Work Session on Patawomeck Park. Mr. Greg Sager, Director of Parks and Recreation, gave a presentation and responded to Board members questions. Mr. Gibbons motioned, seconded by Mr. Milde, to adopt proposed Resolution R07-108.
The Voting Board tally was: Resolution R07-108 reads as follows:
A RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR WHEREAS, the County desires to create the new Patawomeck Park to replace Fritter Park; and WHEREAS, the Board adopted Resolution R06-331 committing all undesignated 2001 Recreation Bond Funds to Patawomeck Park Phase I construction; and WHEREAS, as part of the land swap, the County will receive $500,000 from the developer of Fritter Park to help offset Patawomeck Park Phase I construction costs; and WHEREAS, despite an estimated deficit for the construction of both the proposed and mandatory Phase I amenities at Patawomeck Park, the Department of Parks and Recreation is seeking approval to solicit bids for construction of Phase I of Patawomeck Park; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Stafford County Board of Supervisors on this the 20th day of February, 2007, that the County Administrator be and he hereby is authorized to solicit bids for the construction of Phase I of Patawomeck Park. Legislative; Work Session on North Stafford YMCA. Mr. Greg Sager, Director of Parks and Recreation, commented. Mr. Bernard Reiley, Executive Director of the YMCA, gave a presentation and responded to Board members questions. Mr. Gibbons motioned, seconded by Mr. Dudenhefer, that the Board support $218,000 in funding in FY08 budget with a “moral obligation” to the YMCA for the remaining 19 years. Mr. Brito made a substitute motion, seconded by Mr. Schwartz, to schedule a public hearing on the issue.
The Voting Board tally was:
The Voting Board tally on the original motion was: Legislative; Work Session on Conservation Easements and Purchase of Development Rights. Ms. Kathy Baker, Assistant Director of Planning and Community Development, commented. Mr. Charles Ivins, District Manager/Conservation Specialist, Tri-County/City Soil and Water Conservation District, gave a presentation and responded to Board members questions. Mr. Fields motioned, seconded by Mr. Brito, to request that the Tri-County/City Soil and Water Conservation District come back with a Memorandum of Understanding and scope of services. Discussion ensued.
The Voting Board tally was: Discussion further ensued. Mr. Milde motioned, seconded by Mr. Schwartz, to adopt proposed Ordinance O07-02.
The Voting Board tally was: Ordinance O07-02 reads as follows: AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND REORDAIN THE STAFFORD COUNTY CODE BY ADDING CHAPTER 22A, PURCHASE OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS, TO THE STAFFORD COUNTY CODE WHEREAS, the Board established the Agricultural Commission in December, 2000, to establish a comprehensive approach to the preservation of agricultural and rural lands; and WHEREAS, the Board requested the Agricultural Commission to develop a Purchase of Development Rights (PDR) Program; and WHEREAS, the Agricultural Commission has received assistance from various agencies active in the establishment of a PDR program; and WHEREAS, the Board established a sub-committee to review a proposed PDR ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Board feels that the establishment of a PDR program will help address the problems of sustainable growth, preservation of rural lands, and promotion and facilitation of agriculture, environmental integrity and land values; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Stafford County Board of Supervisors on this the 9th day of January, 2007, that the Stafford County Code be amended and reordained to add Chapter 22A, Purchase of Development Rights, as follows:
Section I. Purpose Section I. Purpose The purpose of the Stafford County Purchase of Development Rights Program (PDR) includes, but is not limited to the following:
Goals of the County’s Comprehensive Plan include “Preserve and enhance opportunities for agricultural uses, agribusiness, and silviculture operations”, “Continue emphasis on the Growth Area concept and on the preservation of a rural character in areas outside of the Growth Area”, and “Preserve and enhance the County’s natural resources.” All three of these goals will be enhanced through the development and implementation of a Purchase of Development Rights (PDR) program. The PDR program shall be a program by which the County acquires, in accordance with the provisions set forth herein, and to the extent of available funding, the development rights on eligible parcels of rural land in areas of the County described in Section III below. The purchase of development rights shall be accomplished by the acquisition of conservation easements upon such parcels. The PDR program shall be directed toward property that lies outside the designated growth area as depicted on the most recent Land Use Map except in those areas under the ownership or control of the United States of America, or the Commonwealth of Virginia, or an agency or instrumentality thereof. However, if property within the designated growth area meets the intent of the program, the landowner may apply to the program and the Board shall consider the merits of the application. Nothing in this Ordinance shall be construed as a limitation upon the County's authority to acquire land for public purposes other than those set forth in this Ordinance. Section II. Applicability The PDR program shall be available for all qualifying lands in the County, except those lands under ownership or control of the United States of America, the Commonwealth of Virginia, or an agency or instrumentality thereof. Any conservation easement acquired pursuant to this program shall be voluntarily offered by the owner. Section III. Definitions
The following definitions shall apply in the interpretation and implementation of this chapter:
G) Biodiversity means the interconnectedness of all life forms on Earth, diversity of plant and animal life in a particular habitat.
A) Designation. The Board shall appoint a PDR Program Administrator. The administrator shall report to the Deputy County Administrator.
B) Power and duties. The administrator shall administer the PDR program and shall have powers and responsibilities to: Section V. Purchase of Development Rights Committee established; powers and duties a) Establishment. The PDR committee is hereby established, as follows:
1) The committee shall consist of seven members appointed by b) Power and duties: The PDR committee shall have the powers and duties to:
1) Promote the program in cooperation with and under the guidance of the administrator, by providing educational materials to the public and conducting informational meetings. Section VI. Appraisal review committee established; powers and duties. a) Establishment. The appraisal review committee is hereby established as provided herein: 1) An appraisal review committee shall be created by the PDR committee and shall operate directly under its supervision.
b) Powers and Duties. The appraisal review committee shall have the power and duty to review appraisals to ensure they are consistent with appropriate appraisal guidelines and practices and make recommendations thereon to the PDR committee and provide approved appraisal results to the PDR committee and the administrator. This power and duty shall not include the authority to alter or substitute an appraisal, but only to evaluate its appropriateness under specific guidelines and practices. Section VII. Eligibility Criteria In order for a parcel to be eligible for the purchase of development rights program, it must meet the following criteria: (a) The property must be located in Stafford County within that portion of the County as described in Section I above. (b) The property must be no less than twenty (20) acres in area, or be included in a batch in which the combined area of contiguous parcels is no less than twenty (20) acres in area. (c) The property must be wholly located within an agricultural or rural residential zoning district, including A-1 or A-2, or any combination of such zoning districts; (d) The property must be capable of being subdivided or developed for nonagricultural uses without legislative approval; (e) The proposed use of the property as permanent open space shall conform with the policies set forth in Stafford County’s Comprehensive Plan; (f) No uses or structures other than those permitted by the conservation easement shall be located upon the parcel; (g) If any portion of the property being considered contains any land that is currently reserved or set aside for open space, recreation or similar purposes pursuant to the provisions of a conditional use permit, variance, or other action by the Board, or any ordinance or regulation; that portion shall be excluded from the appraisal process. Section VIII. Property Ranking System
In order to effectuate the purposes of this chapter, parcels for which conservation easement applications have been received shall be evaluated by using a ranking system. The initial ranking system and any changes to the ranking system shall be approved by the Board of Supervisors.
100 acres or more – 10
80% or more – 10
C. Parcel contains active farmland with a majority zone A-1.
Parcel subject to potential forced sale - 10
80% or more - 10
-One point for each five (5) percent of the purchase price leveraged or below market value.10
1,000 linear feet or more - 10
-Timber harvesting restrictions or timber buffers =10 pts.
0 to 3 dwelling units – 8
Contiguous – 8
Contiguous – 8
Contiguous – 8
C-1 Outstanding Conservation Significance - 10
80% or more – 8
Contains or is contiguous – 8
Parcel either includes or is adjacent to SUB-TOTAL POINTS 30
Property contains or is contiguous to important historic
Each Conservation Easement shall conform with the requirements of the Open-Space Land Act of 1966 (Code of VA. Section 10.1-1700 et seq.) and this chapter. The deed of easement shall be in a form approved by the County Attorney and shall contain, at a minimum, the following provisions: a) Restrictions on new dwellings. No new dwellings may be constructed on a parcel except as provided hereafter. The deed of easement may allow for one new dwelling per 100 acres, with the location of the dwelling and all appurtenances specified on a plat of subdivision approved by the County and recorded before or contemporaneously with the execution and recordation of the conservation easement. b) Conservation easement duration. A conservation easement acquired under the terms of this chapter shall be perpetual and shall run with the land. c) Other restrictions. In addition to the foregoing, the parcel shall be subject to standard restrictions contained in conservation easements pertaining to the uses and activities allowed on the parcel. These standard restrictions shall be delineated in the deed of easement and shall include, but not necessarily be limited to restrictions pertaining to i) the accumulation of trash, debris, inoperable motor vehicles, and other junk; ii) the display of billboards, signs and modes of advertisements upon the property; iii) grading or clearing for purposes unrelated or not connected with the bonafide agricultural use of the property, blasting or earth removal; (iv) conducting of industrial or commercial activities on the parcel other than specified limited commercial activities associated with the bonafide agricultural use of the property. d) Designation of easement holder. Stafford County shall be the easement holder, and, at its discretion, one or more additional public bodies, as defined and provided for in Section 10.1-1700 of the Code of Virginia, or one or more organizations then qualifying as an eligible donee as defined by Section 170(h)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, may also be an easement co-holder. Section X. Application and Evaluation procedure Each application for a conservation easement shall be processed and evaluated as follows: a) Application; programs materials to be provided to owner. The application materials provided by the administrator to an owner shall include, at a minimum, a standard application form and information about the PDR program.
b) Application form. Each application shall be submitted to the administrator on the standard form prepared by the administrator. The application form shall require, at a minimum that the owner provide: c) Additional application information required by administrator. The administrator may require the owner to provide additional information deemed necessary to determine: (i) whether the proposed easement is eligible for purchase; (ii) the ranking of the parcel; and (iii) the value of such easement. d) Submittal of application. Applications shall be submitted to the administrator. An application fee may be required. An application may be submitted at any time during an open application period. However, applications received after an open application period deadline shall be held by the administrator until the next open application period. e) Evaluation by administrator. The administrator shall evaluate each application received and determine whether the application is complete. If the application is incomplete, the administrator shall inform the owner in writing of the information that must be submitted in order for the application to be deemed complete. When the application is deemed complete, the administrator shall determine whether the parcel satisfies the eligibility criteria set forth in Section VII, and if it does, shall determine the number of points to be attributed to the parcel by applying the ranking system in accordance with Section VIII. The administrator shall then rank each parcel with the parcel scoring the most points being the highest ranked and descending in order therefrom. The administrator shall submit the list of ranked parcels to the PDR committee after each open application period. f) Evaluation by PDR committee. The PDR committee shall review the list of ranked parcels submitted by the administrator. The PDR committee shall forward to the administrator and to the Board its recommendations as to which conservation easements should be purchased under the provisions of this Chapter. g) Evaluation by Board. The Board shall review the list of ranked parcels submitted by the PDR committee and identify by resolution, which conservation easements should be purchased and their priority of purchase. Nothing in this chapter shall obligate the Board to purchase a conservation easement on any property that is deemed eligible for purchase and that the Board identifies for purchase under this subsection. h) Appraisal of conservation easement value. Each conservation easement identified by the Board to be purchased shall be appraised by an independent qualified appraiser contracted by the County for such purpose. Each completed appraisal shall be submitted to the program administrator and the owner. The program administrator shall forward each appraisal to the appraisal review committee, which shall review each appraisal and make recommendations thereon to the PDR committee. i) Requirements and deadlines may be waived. Any requirement or deadline set forth in this chapter may be waived by the Board if, for good cause, it is shown that exigent circumstances exist that warrant consideration of an otherwise untimely application or it is shown that the requirements of this ordinance unreasonably restrict the purchase of an easement. Under such circumstances, the Board may authorize purchase of a conservation easement at any time it deems necessary so long as the purchase meets the intent of the Purchase of Development Rights Program as identified in the Comprehensive Plan and the purchase complies with the specific purposes and applicability of this ordinance as set out herein. j) Reapplication. An owner of a parcel not selected by the Board for purchase of a conservation easement may reapply in any future open application period. XI. Purchase of Development Rights Procedure Applications to sell development rights shall be on a form prescribed by the administrator and shall be signed by the landowner and submitted to the director. The director may require supporting documentation, including deeds, surveys or other legal instruments, to be submitted with the application. A landowner may submit an application for each parcel or may submit a single application for more than one contiguous parcel. Applications for batched parcels shall follow the same procedure, but shall be signed by all landowners. Applications must be received no later than June 30 to be eligible for consideration during that calendar year. (a) The administrator shall review each application to determine whether the eligibility criteria set forth in Section III are met and all required information is provided, and shall notify the landowner of his determination. Incomplete or otherwise deficient applications shall be rejected and returned to the landowner with a statement of reasons for the rejection. (b) In the event a parcel, or portion thereof, fails to meet the eligibility criteria set forth in Section III, such parcel, or portion thereof, shall not be considered for inclusion in the program. In the event the ineligibility of a parcel or portion thereof, renders the remaining property which is the subject of the application ineligible, none of the property shall be considered for inclusion. (c) In the event available funding is insufficient to purchase the development rights on all properties which are the subject of pending applications under this ordinance, the director shall evaluate each application, using the criteria of the property ranking system set forth in Section VIII, and shall ascertain all necessary facts and information for ranking the priority of acquisition of the lands included in the application. In performing such evaluation, the administrator may request the assistance of such other county departments and agencies as may be appropriate and beneficial. The evaluation shall include a recommendation for the number of agricultural ranking system points to be assigned to the application. No later than ninety (90) days after receipt of the completed application, the director shall forward a copy of the evaluation to each member of the commission and to the county administrator and the landowner. (d) The submission of an application shall not be deemed to constitute a binding contractual offer to convey any interest in the landowner's property, but shall be revocable at will by the landowner prior to the execution of an installment purchase agreement, without penalty. Section XII. Outreach
The PDR Committee envisions an annual process to solicit applications for the sale of development rights to the County. As part of that process, an effective outreach effort to the public would inform those who may be interested in the program of the goals and
An effective easement program involves periodic inspection to ensure that the rights acquired are protected. The County also has the ability to coordinate this effort with its land development process for approving subdivisions and building permits. In the event enforcement action in necessary, the staff responsible for administration of the program and inspection of property would work with the County Attorney. Staff may assist landowners in determining whether proposed uses or activities are consistent with easement restrictions on particular properties. In the event an easement in held jointly by the County and another organization, these inspection and enforcement efforts would need to be coordinated. The local Soil and Water Conservation District may be able to provide assistance in the regard. The District currently helps landowners to prepare and implement soil and water conservation plans required by grant program criteria or the State or County guidelines in conjunction with its land use tax program. It also assists in the design and cost-sharing of Best Management Practices and verified compliance with BMPs and farm management plans. The County should fund a periodic inspection program but seek as much assistance as possible in this regard from any organizations holding easements jointly in the County. In addition, the inspection program should be closely coordinated with, and seek the assistance of the Soil and Water Conservation District where applicable. Legislative; Urban Transportation Service District. Mr. David Gayle, Assistant Director of Economic Development and Legislative Affairs, gave a presentation and responded to Board members questions. Mr. Gibbons motioned, seconded by Mr. Dudenhefer, to make a recommendation for an amendment to House Bill 3202, to allow areas of urban commercial and industrial development to be included within the boundaries of the Urban Transportation Service District. The County has substantial areas of existing commercial and industrial development, some of which includes public streets that are maintained by the Commonwealth and should be included in the lane-mile calculations to determine level of funding.
The Voting Board tally was: Legislative; Closed Meeting. At 4:55 P.M., Mr. Dudenhefer motioned, seconded by Mr. Fields, to adopt proposed Resolution CM07-06.
The Voting Board tally was: Resolution CM07-06 reads as follows: A RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE CLOSED MEETING WHEREAS, the Board of County Supervisors desires to consult with counsel and discuss in Closed Meeting legal advice in regard to the Dominion Power Line Case; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 2.2-3711(a)(7) Va. Code Ann., such discussions may occur in Closed Meeting; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Stafford Board of Supervisors, on this the 20th day of February, 2007, does hereby authorize discussions of the aforestated matters in Closed Meeting. Call to Order. At 5:43 P.M., the Chairman called the meeting back to order. Legislative; Closed Meeting Certification. Mr. Gibbons motioned, seconded by Mr. Fields, to adopt proposed Resolution CM07-06a.
The Voting Board tally was: Resolution CM07-06a reads as follows: A RESOLUTION TO CERTIFY THE ACTIONS OF THE STAFFORD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS IN A CLOSED MEETING ON FEBRUARY 20, 2007 WHEREAS, the Board has, on this the 20th day of February, 2007, adjourned into a closed meeting in accordance with a formal vote of the Board and in accordance with the provisions of the Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, the Virginia Freedom of Information Act, as it became effective July 1, 1989, provides for certification that such Closed Meeting was conducted in conformity with law; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Stafford County Board of Supervisors does hereby certify, on this the 20th day of February 2007, that to the best of each member's knowledge: (1) only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements under the Virginia Freedom of Information Act were discussed in the Closed Meeting to which this certification applies; and (2) only such public business matters as were identified in the Motion by which the said Closed Meeting was convened were heard, discussed, or considered by the Board. No member dissents from the aforesaid certification. Recess. At 5:44 P.M., the Chairman declared a recess until 7:00 P. M. Invocation. Mr. Schwartz gave the Invocation. Pledge of Allegiance. Mr. Dudenhefer gave the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America. Legislative; Presentation of a Proclamation. · Recognize and Commend Kathleen M. Beck and Fredericksburg Regional Transit for Their Assistance During the Discover Days Festival. Presentations by the Public. The following persons spoke on topics as identified:
Shawn Lawrence - People with disabilities. Utilities; Vacate Sanitary Sewer Easement and Public Property Lines at 4022 Jefferson Davis Highway. The County Administrator gave a presentation and responded to Board members questions.
The Chairman opened a public hearing. Mr. Cavalier motioned, seconded by Mr. Gibbons, to adopt proposed Resolution R07-39.
The Voting Board tally was: Resolution R07-39 reads as follows:
A RESOLUTION TO VACATE SEWER EASEMENTS AND WHEREAS, the County has replaced the existing wastewater pump station located at 4022 Jefferson Davis Highway and abandoned the existing pumping station along with certain sanitary sewer lines; and WHEREAS, the former site and some of the sanitary sewer easements near the former sewage pump station site are no longer needed for County use; and WHEREAS, the Board has carefully considered the recommendations of the Staff and the testimony received at the public hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Stafford County Board of Supervisors on this the 20th day of February, 2007, that the County Administrator be and he hereby is authorized to vacate unnecessary sanitary sewer easements on Tax Map Parcel 13-9; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the County Administrator be and he hereby is authorized to take all necessary actions to accomplish the vacation of the identified easements and the conveyance of Tax Map Parcel 13A 1 6A (0.031 acres) to Hilldrup Moving and Storage Inc. Legislative; Regular Agenda Additions and Deletions. Mr. Gibbons motioned, seconded by Mr. Fields, to add appointments to the regular agenda.
The Voting Board tally was: Legislative; Consent Agenda. Mr. Gibbons motioned, seconded by Mr. Dudenhefer, to adopt the Consent Agenda consisting of Items 7 thru 16A, omitting items 10a, 10b, 14 and 15.
The Voting Board tally was: Item 7. Finance; Approve Expenditure Listings. Resolution R07-90 reads as follows:
A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE EXPENDITURE LISTING (EL) WHEREAS, the Board has appropriated funds to be expended for the purchase of goods and services in accordance with an approved budget; and WHEREAS, the payments appearing on the above-referenced Listing of Expenditures represent payment of $100,000 and greater for the purchase of goods and/or services which are within the appropriated amounts; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Stafford County Board of Supervisors on this the 20th day of February 2007, that the above-mentioned EL be and it hereby is approved. Item 8. Public Information; Adopt Proclamations. Proclamation P07-05 reads as follows:
A PROCLAMATION TO COMMEMORATE POSTHUMOUSLY WHEREAS, Col. Paul M. Kelly, a helicopter pilot, served in Operation Iraqi Freedom with the Reserve Component Division of the Multi-National Corps Iraq as commander of an Army National Guard liaison team; and WHEREAS, Col. Paul M. Kelly and 11 other military service members perished on January 20, 2007, when the UH-60 Black Hawk helicopter in which they were riding crashed northeast of Baghdad, Iraq; and WHEREAS, Col. Paul M. Kelly was commissioned as an officer through the University of Dayton’s Reserve Officers’ Training Corps and spent his career in staff and leadership positions serving with the Guard in Ohio, South Carolina and Virginia; and WHEREAS, Col. Paul M. Kelly earned his troops’ deep and abiding respect as a mentor and role model to young men and women beginning their military careers, and was nicknamed “the Senator” for his habit of always making a point to shake soldiers’ hands, no matter what their rank; and WHEREAS, Col. Paul M. Kelly was an avid Civil War buff who dreamed of teaching high school history after retiring from military service; and WHEREAS, Col. Paul M. Kelly belonged to the Knights of Columbus, was an active and deeply religious parishioner at St. William of York Catholic Church, and volunteered at his sons’ parish school and with seniors in his community; and WHEREAS, Col. Paul M. Kelly was a loving husband to his wife, Maria, and proud father of their two sons, Paul and John; and WHEREAS, the Board desires to bring to the attention of citizens everywhere the ultimate sacrifice made by this modern warrior who exemplified patriotism, honor and a deep devotion to his country; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED by the Stafford County Board of Supervisors on this the 20th day of February, 2007, that Col. Paul M. Kelly be and he hereby is commemorated posthumously. Proclamation P07-04 reads as follows:
A PROCLAMATION TO RECOGNIZE AND COMMEND ANDREW E. WHEREAS, Andrew E. Loft serves as Director of Bands and Music Department Chair at Colonial Forge High School; and WHEREAS, Andrew E. Loft is hailed by his students and colleagues as an exceptional educator who creates a learning environment focused on providing the knowledge, structure and encouragement critical to the educational and personal success of each student; and WHEREAS, Andrew E. Loft received a Bachelor’s Degree in Music Education at the University of Tennessee at Martin and a Master’s Degree in Music, Tuba Performance, from the University of Miami, and continues his professional development as a performer with the Fairfax Wind Symphony; and WHEREAS, Andrew E. Loft works tirelessly and employs his joyous enthusiasm to attract talented young musicians to the award-winning Colonial Forge High School band program, while skillfully managing the marching band, three concert bands, a jazz ensemble and a percussion ensemble; and WHEREAS, Andrew E. Loft encourages a spirit of community by coordinating and hosting the annual All County and All District Band auditions, inviting the middle school bands to perform at a fall football game, and sponsoring free concerts by the U.S. Navy Band and other military service ensembles at Colonial Forge High School; and WHEREAS, Andrew E. Loft has been chosen by his colleagues and school administrators as Stafford County’s Teacher of the Year and will earn The Washington Post Agnes Meyer Outstanding Teacher of the Year Award as a result of this honor; and WHEREAS, the Board desires to bring to the attention of citizens everywhere the commitment and professionalism with which Andrew E. Loft serves his students and the community; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED by the Stafford County Board of Supervisors on this the 20th day of February, 2007, that Andrew E. Loft be and he hereby is recognized and commended as Stafford County’s Teacher of the Year. Item 9. Planning; Authorize Historic Preservation Scholarship and Contest. Resolution R07-74 reads as follows:
A RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE THE DEPARTMENT OF WHEREAS, the Board has appointed individuals to the Architectural Review Board to act in an advisory role to other officials and departments of local government regarding protection of the County cultural resources for the use, observation, education, pleasure, and welfare of the people; and WHEREAS, the Board has also charged the Architectural Review Board to disseminate information within the County on historic preservation issues and concerns; and WHEREAS, a historic preservation scholarship and contest will provide an incentive for students to learn about the County’s cultural resources and historic preservation issues and concerns; and WHEREAS, the cash prizes will motivate students to participate in the scholarship and contest; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Stafford County Board of Supervisors on this the 20th day of February, 2007, that the Department of Planning and Community Development be and is hereby authorized to provide cash prizes for a historic preservation scholarship and contest. Item 10c. Treasurer; Amend and Reordain the County Code Entitled “Service Charge for Bad Checks Tendered County”. Resolution R07-102 reads as follows:
A RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR WHEREAS, the Board desires to consider a change in the service charges and collection fees; and WHEREAS, the Board desires to consider public comments concerning the proposed changes; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Stafford County Board of Supervisors on this the 20th day of February, 2007, that the County Administrator be and he hereby is authorized to advertise for a public hearing for March 6, 2007 to allow for presentation and public comment for the purpose of amending and readopting service charges and collection fees. Item 11. Administration; Authorize Additional Funds for Construction of the Government Center. Resolution R07-97 reads as follows:
A RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR WHEREAS, renovations are underway to the former Fire and Rescue Administration offices for use by the General Registrar and the Department of Economic Development; and WHEREAS, extensive water damage has been discovered and the Board desires a long-term protection for the building; and WHEREAS, under the Fairfax County contract (Council of Government rider) Centennial Construction has provided a bid for construction costs; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Stafford County Board of Supervisors on this the 20th day of February, 2007, that the County Administrator be and he hereby is authorized to execute a contract with Centennial Construction in an amount not to exceed $185,000; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that proffers in the amount of $1,560 be and they hereby are budgeted and appropriated to the General Fund, Capital Projects category. Item 12. Economic Development; Support Request for Federal Funding for County Priorities through the Federal Appropriations Process. Resolution R07-91 reads as follows:
A RESOLUTION TO SUPPORT REQUESTS FOR FEDERAL WHEREAS, the Chairman and Vice-Chairman of the Board will travel to Washington, D.C. on February 28, 2007 to meet with Senators Warner and Webb and Congresswoman Jo Ann Davis; and WHEREAS, the purpose of this annual legislative trip to Capitol Hill will be to discuss federal funding for County priorities through federal appropriations process; and WHEREAS, specifically, the priorities include federal funding for safety and streetscape improvements to the Courthouse area and for upgrades to the County’s public safety communications system; and WHEREAS, the Board desires to go on record with additional priorities and discuss BRAC (parity with Ft. Belvoir federal infrastructure support), HOT Lanes, 3rd Rail and the Virginia Railway Express; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Stafford County Board of Supervisors on this the 20th day of February 2007, that it be and hereby does endorse efforts to secure federal funding for the aforementioned priorities; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this resolution be provided to the members of Stafford’s congressional delegation so that they may be apprised of the sense of the Board on this matter. Item 13. Utilities; Authorize Acceptance of Property to the Board of Supervisors from the Economic Development Authority. Resolution R07-93 reads as follows:
A RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR WHEREAS, the title for certain properties with houses acquired for the Rocky Pen Run Reservoir was transferred from the County to the Economic Development Authority; and WHEREAS, title must be transferred back to the County before these houses can be demolished; and WHEREAS, the Board must authorize the acceptance of the transfer of ownership back to the County; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Stafford County Board of Supervisors on this the 20th day of February, 2007, that the County Administrator be and he hereby is authorized to accept title for properties currently owned by the Economic Development Authority, which were acquired for the Rocky Pen Run Reservoir. Item 16. Legislative; Appoint Members to Boards, Authorities, Commissions and Committees. Resolution R07-109 reads as follows:
A RESOLUTION TO APPOINT A MEMBER TO THE STAFFORD WHEREAS, Resolution R06-489 changed the membership of the Beautification Committee; and WHEREAS, Resolution R06-489 authorized 12 members to be appointed to the Beautification Committee, one to represent Stafford County Public Schools/Community Involvement, Master Gardener, Sheriff’s Office, Extension Office, County Government, and one representative from each of the County's seven election districts; and WHEREAS, the Board has previously appointed the following: NAME EXPIRATION
Shari Kern December 31, 2007
VACANT December 31, 2006
Laura Collingsworth December 31, 2007
Laurie Posner December 31, 2006
Denise Baer December 31, 2007
Patrice Promack December 31, 2007
VACANT December 31, 2006 Julie May December 31, 2007 (County Government)
Ian Treggett December 31, 2007
Deputy Craig Cain December 31, 2007
Cynthia Lucero-Chavez December 31, 2007
Linda Dunn December 31, 2007 WHEREAS, a vacancy exists in the Falmouth district; and WHEREAS, the term of membership is one year; WHEREAS, the Board desires to fill this vacancy; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Stafford County Board of Supervisors on this the 20th day of February, 2007, that NAME EXPIRATION
Janie Cindric December 31, 2007 be and she hereby is appointed to the Beautification Committee. Item 16A. Legislative; Consider Joining with the Prince William County Board of Supervisors in Opposing the Designation of a National Interest Electric Transmission Corridor in Prince William County. Resolution R07-112 reads as follows:
A RESOLUTION TO JOIN THE PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY WHEREAS, Dominion Virginia Power, Allegheny Power and PJM Interconnection desire to build a 500-kilovolt power line through Frederick, Warren, Fauquier, Prince William, and Loudoun Counties; and WHEREAS, Section 56-46.1 of the Code of Virginia (1950), as amended, exempts the proposed 500-kilovolt power line from public facility review by the County and vests the approval process solely in the State Corporation Commission; and WHEREAS, Section 56-46.1 provides that the State Corporation Commission shall determine whether or not the line is needed and that the corridor or route the line is to follow will reasonably minimize adverse impact on scenic assets, historic districts, and environment of the area concerned; and WHEREAS, the Energy Policy Act of 2005 allows the U.S. Department of Energy to designate multiple jurisdictions, including all of Prince William County, as “National Interest Electric Transmission Corridors” (NIETC) which enables the use of federal eminent domain authority to acquire the easements necessary for the construction and operation of the proposed power line; and WHEREAS, once granted, NIETC status would overlay Prince William County for a period of 10 years, adversely impacting property values and jeopardizing citizens quality of life; and WHEREAS, the full extent of impacts to historic, scenic, archaeological, cultural, and rural crescent resources have not been studied; and WHEREAS, the health, safety, and general welfare is not served by the approval of the designation of the NIETC status in Prince William County; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Stafford County Board of Supervisors on this the 20th day of February, 2007, that it does hereby join the Prince William County Board of Supervisors in opposing the designation of a National Interest Electric Transmission Corridor in Prince William County. Planning; Authorize a Public Hearing to Amend Section 28-25, Specific Terms; and 28-39, Special Regulations, of the Zoning Ordinance. Mr. Milde commented. Mr. Milde motioned, seconded by Mr. Gibbons, to adopt proposed Resolution R07-101. Discussion ensued.
The Voting Board tally was: Resolution R07-101 reads as follows:
A RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR WHEREAS, cemeteries are a valuable and important resource to the culture and history of the County; and WHEREAS, a goal of the Comprehensive Plan is to preserve significant historic and/or archaeological sites and cemeteries through private, public and quasi-public groups; and WHEREAS, per Section 15.2-2283 of the Code of Virginia (1950), as amended, the purpose of zoning is to protect against destruction of or encroachment upon historic sites; and WHEREAS, cemeteries are identified with plans of development but at times it has not been known if all of the resources have been identified and if the cemetery is being maintained and protected; and WHEREAS, the Board desires standards to identify, protect and maintain cemeteries with all plans of development; and WHEREAS, the Board finds that public necessity, convenience, general welfare, or good zoning practices requires adoption of such an ordinance; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Stafford County Board of Supervisors on this the 20th day of February, 2007, that the County Administrator be and he hereby is authorized to advertise a public hearing on March 20, 2007, to amend and readopt Section 28-25 and Section 28-39 of the Zoning Ordinance. Finance; Consider Participation in the Spring 2007 VPSA Bond Sale for $22,780,000 and Budget and Appropriate the Proceeds. Mr. Gibbons commented.
Mr. Gibbons motioned, seconded by Mr. Dudenhefer, to adopt proposed Resolution Discussion ensued.
The Voting Board tally was: Resolution R07-81 reads as follows:
A RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE A PUBLIC HEARING TO WHEREAS, the Board has received a request from the Superintendent of the Stafford County Public Schools to contract a debt and issue general obligation bonds of the County in the maximum amount of $22,780,000 in one or more series to finance certain capital improvements for public school purposes (the "Bonds") and to sell such bonds to the Virginia Public School Authority ("VPSA"); and WHEREAS, the Board has determined that it may be necessary or desirable to advance money to pay the costs for such capital projects for public school purposes (the "Projects") and to reimburse such advances with proceeds of one or more financings. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Stafford County Board of Supervisors: 1. The Board of Supervisors adopts this declaration of official intent under Treasury Regulations Section 1.150.2. The Board of Supervisors reasonably expects to reimburse advances made or to be made by the County or the School Board of the County of Stafford, Virginia, to pay the costs of acquiring, constructing, and equipping the Projects from the proceeds of the Bonds to be issued in the maximum amount of $22,780,000. 2. The County Administrator is authorized to advertise a public hearing to be held on March 20, 2007 on the issuance of the Bonds and on budgeting an appropriating the proceeds. 3. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. Planning; Donate Fees for Housing Opportunities Made Economical (HOME) Inc. Mr. Fields commented.
Mr. Dudenhefer motioned, seconded by Mr. Schwartz, to adopt proposed Resolution Discussion ensued.
The Voting Board tally was: Resolution R07-99 reads as follows:
A RESOLUTION TO DONATE FUNDS EQUAL TO THE COST WHEREAS, HOME, Inc. submitted applications for and received approval of a proffer amendment; and WHEREAS, HOME, Inc. is a non-profit, tax-exempt, agency providing housing for residents with severe handicaps within the County and as such has requested reimbursement of the application fees; and WHEREAS, the Board cannot waive or reimburse fees; and WHEREAS, the Board desires to make a charitable contribution to HOME, Inc. for their project in the County in an amount equal to the application fees; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Stafford County Board of Supervisors on this the 20th day of February, 2007, that a donation in the amount of Eight Thousand Dollars ($8,000) be and it is hereby made to Housing Opportunities Made Economical, Inc. to be used for their housing projects within Stafford County. Administration; Authorize Appointment of Acting Zoning Administrator. Mr. Schwartz commented. Mr. Schwartz motioned, seconded by Mr. Dudenhefer, to discuss proposed Resolution R07-105 in Closed Meeting.
The Voting Board tally was: Public Services; Recommend to Virginia Department of Transportation and Commonwealth Transportation Board the FY2008-3013 Interstate, Primary and Urban Systems Six-Year Improvement Program and Express Support for Construction Funding for the New Interstate 95 Interchange with Courthouse Road. Mr. Milde motioned, seconded by Mr. Schwartz, to adopt proposed Resolution R07-106.
The Voting Board tally was: Resolution R07-106 reads as follows:
A RESOLUTION FOR THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) is updating its Interstate, Primary, and Urban Six-Year Improvement Program (SYIP) for FY2008-FY2013; and WHEREAS, the Commonwealth Transportation Board (CTB), as it deliberates on approves of the FY2008-FY2013 SYIP, is guided by comments received; and WHEREAS, the Board supports this transportation planning process; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Stafford County Board of Supervisors on this the 20th day of February, 2007, that the Board be and it hereby expresses to VDOT and the CTB its support for funding the construction of a new interchange with Interstate 95 and Courthouse Road (SR-630), funding the improvement project known as the Falmouth intersection, and funding for the Warrenton Road (US-17) improvement project from Sanford Drive (SR-607) to Village Parkway (SR-1800); and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be submitted to the VDOT Fredericksburg District Administrator. Mr. Milde motioned, seconded by Mr. Schwartz, to adopt proposed Resolution R07-107.
The Voting Board tally was: Resolution R07-107 reads as follows:
A RESOLUTION FOR THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) received conditional approval from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) on November 16, 1992 for the construction of the interchange at Interstate 95 and Centreport Parkway; and WHEREAS, a condition of this approval was that construction funding be allocated by VDOT for a new interchange with Courthouse Road, SR-630, at a new location just south of the existing interchange; and WHEREAS, the County contributed $10,000,000 toward the construction of the Interstate 95/Centreport Parkway interchange; and WHEREAS, the Board supports the construction of the new interchange with Interstate 95 and Courthouse Road, SR-630; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Stafford County Board of Supervisors on this the 20th day of February, 2007, that the Board be and it hereby impresses upon the Commonwealth Transportation Board (CTB) and VDOT the criticality of completing its FHWA obligation to begin substantial activity toward the construction of this new interchange; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be submitted to the VDOT Fredericksburg District Administrator. Legislative; Discuss Mandatory Connections to Utilities. Mr. Robert E. Bos, Public Utilities Administrator, gave a presentation and responded to Board members’ questions. Mr. Gibbons motioned, seconded by Mr. Fields, to adopt proposed Resolution R07-110. Discussion ensued.
The Voting Board tally was: Resolution R07-110 reads as follows:
A RESOLUTION TO REFER MANDATORY WHEREAS, the Board at a meeting on December 13, 2005 adopted Ordinance O05-50, which required any proposed development within the urban Service Area to connect to utilities; and WHEREAS, there exists a few projects with proposed well and/or septic systems that are located within the Urban Service Area which did not gain approval prior to the adopted Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Board desires the Utilities Commission to review the issue as said projects must be redesigned in order to provide connection (s) to public utilities in accordance with the Ordinance; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Stafford County Board of Supervisors on this the 20th day of February, 2007, that the Utilities Commission is requested to review the issue of mandatory connections with regard to the following projects and report back to the Board.
Ø Aquia Overlook, Section 3 Planning; Refer to the Planning Commission an Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance Regarding Administrative Exception for Public Improvements. Mr. Jeff Harvey, Director of Planning and Community Development, gave a presentation. Mr. Schwartz motioned, seconded by Mr. Gibbons to adopt proposed Resolution R07-73. Discussion ensued. Mr. Brito made a substitute motion, seconded by Mr. Schwartz, the application for the Rocky Pen Run Reservoir special exemption go for public hearing in front of the Board of Zoning Appeals and that staff is not authorized to withdraw the application unless there are less than 5 members present.
The Voting Board tally was: Legislative; Appoint Members to Boards, Authorities, Commissions and Committees.
Mr. Cavalier motioned, seconded by Mr. Gibbons, to adopt proposed Resolution
The Voting Board tally was: Resolution R07-124 reads as follows:
A RESOLUTION TO APPOINT A MEMBER TO WHEREAS, the Economic Development Authority of Stafford was established by Ordinance of the Board on June 10, 1970, and a total of seven (7) Directors were appointed initially for terms of one (1), two (2), three (3) and four (4) years; two (2) being appointed for one (1) year terms, two (2) being appointed for two (2) year terms, two (2) being appointed for three (3) year terms and one (1) being appointed for a four (4) year term; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 15.2-4904 of the Code of Virginia (1950), as amended, subsequent appointments were to be for terms of four (4) years, except appointments to fill vacancies were to be for the unexpired terms and all terms of the office were deemed to commence upon the date of the initial appointment to the Authority and, thereafter, in accordance with these provisions; and WHEREAS, the following members have been appointed: NAME EXPIRATION
Donald H. Newlin June 10, 2007 WHEREAS, Martin Miller has submitted his resignation; and WHEREAS, the Board desires to fill this position; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Stafford County Board of Supervisors on this the 20th day of February, 2007, that NAME EXPIRATION
Mark Safferstone June 10, 2009 be and he hereby is appointed as a member of the Economic Development Authority; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that if at the end of any term of office of any director and a successor thereto has not been appointed, then the director whose term of office has expired shall continue to hold office until a successor is appointed and qualified and that successor shall fulfill the remainder of the term. Legislative; External Auditor Committee. Mr. Schwartz commented. Discussion ensued. Hearing no objections from the Board, the Chairman appointed Mr. Gibbons and Mr. Brito to the External Auditor Committee. Legislative; Closed Meeting. At 8:25 P.M., Mr. Gibbons motioned, seconded by Mr. Fields, to adopt proposed Resolution CM07-07.
The Voting Board tally was: Resolution CM07-07 reads as follows: A RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE CLOSED MEETING WHEREAS, the Board of County Supervisors desires to consult with counsel and discuss in Closed Meeting legal advice in regard to the Crow’s Nest Litigation, the Acquisition of Real Property for Public Purpose in regard to the VRE Parking Facility and a Personnel matter; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 2.2-3711(a)(7), (a)(3) and (a)(1) Va. Code Ann., such discussions may occur in Closed Meeting; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Stafford Board of Supervisors, on this the 20th day of February, 2007, does hereby authorize discussions of the aforestated matters in Closed Meeting. Call to Order. At 8:45 P.M., the Chairman called the meeting back to order. Legislative; Closed Meeting Certification. Mr. Gibbons motioned, seconded by Mr. Fields, to adopt proposed CM07-07a.
The Voting Board tally was: Resolution CM07-07a reads as follows: A RESOLUTION TO CERTIFY THE ACTIONS OF THE STAFFORD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS IN A CLOSED MEETING ON FEBRUARY 20, 2007 WHEREAS, the Board has, on this the 20th day of February, 2007, adjourned into a closed meeting in accordance with a formal vote of the Board and in accordance with the provisions of the Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, the Virginia Freedom of Information Act, as it became effective July 1, 1989, provides for certification that such Closed Meeting was conducted in conformity with law; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Stafford County Board of Supervisors does hereby certify, on this the 20th day of February 2007, that to the best of each member's knowledge: (1) only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements under the Virginia Freedom of Information Act were discussed in the Closed Meeting to which this certification applies; and (2) only such public business matters as were identified in the Motion by which the said Closed Meeting was convened were heard, discussed, or considered by the Board. No member dissents from the aforesaid certification. Administration; Authorize Appointment of Acting Zoning Administrator. Mr. Schwartz motioned, seconded by Mr. Fields, to adopt proposed Resolution R07-105.
The Voting Board tally was: Resolution R07-105 reads as follows:
A RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR’S WHEREAS, the Zoning Administrator’s position is vacant; and WHEREAS, the County Administrator appointed Rachel Hudson as Acting Zoning Administrator effective February 17, 2007; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Stafford County Board of Supervisors on this the 20th day of February 2007, that the Board be and it hereby does concur with the appointment of Rachel Hudson as Acting Zoning Administrator. Adjournment. At 8:47 P. M., the Chairman declared the meeting adjourned.
|
|
Send this to a friend |